dimanche 7 septembre 2014

RHEO-SANS RESULTS CONTRADICT THE CURRENT UNDERSTANDING OF DEFORMATION IN MELTS

shear-thinning: the fatal failure of reptation



Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) studies on polymer melts under steady-state flow provide in situ information on how the flow field is transmitted to the melt at a molecular scale. Such experiments, called "Rheo-SANS, are difficult to set up and require special equipment but their results are fundamental to test experimentally the admitted claim that the shear-thinning of entangled polymer chains is due to significant orientation of the entanglement segments under the shear flow.

I refer below to two significant Rheo-SANS studies, one by Watanabe et al in Japan published in 2007 and the other one by Noirez et al in France published in 2009.

1. Hiroshi Watanabe, Toshiji Kanaya, and Yoshiaki Takahashi "Rheo-SANS behavior of Entangled Polymer Chains with Local Label Under Fast Shear Flow". Activity Report on Neutron Scattering Research: Experimental Reports 14 (2007) Report Number: 146.

2. L. Noirez, H. Mendil-Jakani, P. Baroni Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2009, 30, 1709–1714 ""New Light on Old Wisdoms on Molten Polymers: Conformation, Slippage and Shear Banding in Sheared Entangled and Unentangled Melts".

Both studies conclude that the chains remain largely undeformed under steady-state shear flow conditions for which extensive shear-thinning was present. This means that there is no change of the rms end-to-end distance of the chain as the flow crosses from Newtonian to non- Newtonian, in contradiction with the concept of the deformation of single chains during shear-thinning. These results represent a formidable challenge to the reptation model of melt deformation.

Classical visco-elasticity theory considers the rheological deformation of polymer melts as resulting from the behavior of singular chains embedded in a sea of interactions from other chains. In the existing theories of macromolecular physics, the accent is put on determining the shape of the individual macromolecules, often called their configuration. The presence of neighboring and interpenetrating macromolecules is perceived as a disturbance to the ideal configuration of the chain. In the traditional texts, the field of interaction responsible for the disturbance is homogeneous. One can, therefore, describe the behavior of the melt by describing what happens to a single chain after it has been established how to incorporate the effect of the interactions between the chains.

Thermodynamically speaking, "molecular dynamics" deals with the physics of systems that are single chains This is the case for the popular reptation model introduced by de Gennes and fined tuned by Doi and Edwards, Marrucci, Wagner, Mc Leish and many others. Macromolecules are able to rearrange their multiple configurations with the change of the thermal or mechanical energy input. In the case of shear deformation, the Newtonian viscosity is classically considered to describe the internal friction between the bonds of interacting macromolecules which assume a stable thermodynamics state, the equilibrium state at a given temperature and pressure.
The non-Newtonian behavior, shear-thinning, is due to a modification by the flow of the dimensions of the macromolecules, i.e. of their configuration, which can be calculated from the effect of the shear rate on the rms end to end distance of the macromolecule and the amount of slippage (disentanglement) occurring. Theoretical models predict that for a shear rate strong enough to overpower the ability of the chain to relax, -and this happens at the reptation time-, shear-thinning starts to be observed, corresponding to an increase of the rms end to end distance (chain orientation). In the classical formula that describe the non-Newtonian dependence of viscosity with shear rate, the amount of shear-thinning is only function of two parameters (in addition to the strain rate, of course): the Newtonian viscosity and the value of the reptation time. But these two parameters can be correlated to each other and to the dimensions and interactions between the chains, which simplifies the description of the flow deformation process to the description of the dependence of the reptation time with temperature, pressure, and chain length (the interactions between the macromolecules, defined by "their entanglement", is already incorporated in the definition of the reptation time).

In summary, the effect of strain rate, temperature, molecular weight, could all be resumed to a simple explanation: the deformation and relaxation of single macromolecular chains confined to move within the boundaries of a tube, the entanglement tube, whose lifetime was the reptation time. The whole process would continuously be happening, from very low strain rate to high shear-thinning producing strain rate. Additionally, the reptation model provided a new understanding of "entanglement" by quantifying the dimensions of the tube and correlating it to the reptation time. The interactions between the macromolecules could be described topologically, the tube serving as the new topological description of the environment of the bonds.

This was the beauty of the reptation model of de Gennes which had succeeded in scaling the effect of all variables into the description of a single parameter, the reptation time. Of course, this extraordinary tour de force had to be refined over the years to account for a better description of reality, in particular the molecular weight dependence of the reptation time, which did not follow the predicted M3 variation.

Yet, despite of all its elegance, apparent success and sophistication, the reptation model is not correctly describing the reality of the interactions between the macromolecules (Rheo-SANS experiments of Watanebe et al and Noirez et al) and should be abandoned.

If something as simple as shear-thinning (see the Fig. at the top) cannot be explained by the current theoretical model, I am sorry to say, there is no other solution than abandon it.

The reason for this radical proposition is that the dynamics of the interactions defining the melt properties should not be defined by thermodynamic systems which are the single macromolecules.

I propose to re-consider the mechanism of deformation of polymer melts giving rise to shear-thinning, correctly describing the Rheo-SANS experimental results, and to re-consider the concept of entanglement, the corner stone of polymer physics.