dimanche 23 août 2026

DUAL-PHASE RHEOLOGY PROTOCOL (DPRP)



Re-Formulation of the Rheological Equations of Polymer Melts Pursuant to the Dual-Phase and Cross-Dual-Phase Model of Dissipative Interactions.

 Description of the Dual-Phase Rheology Protocol (DPRP). 



This graph compares the shear-thinning rheological curves for the data (black line), for Dual-Phase 1 (DP1), Dual-Phase 2 (DP2), their sum (DP1+DP2), and their sum with the addition of the inactive Dual-Phase portion of the network of interacting Dual-conformers: (DP1+DP2+dc), the green triangles pointing down. The viscosity of each Dual-Phase is calculated from its c structure, c = c1+c2, with c = (G’/G”)2 ; c1 and c2 are the respective contributions of the free volume and of the rotation isomeric state (RIS) of the Dual-conformers to the active elasticity c.


ABSTRACT

 

The current equations describing the dynamic rheology of polymer melts provide the correlations between the modulus of visco-elasticity, G*(w), splitting into its elastic and viscous moduli, G’(w) and G”(w), respectively, and the frequency of the shear deformation applied to the melt, w. The dynamic viscosity of the melt, h* = G*/w is usually used to compare melts of different chemical nature or to study the effect of molecular weight, M, its dispersity, and the presence or the absence of branches, short or long. The equations also describe the influence of external variables on the rheological state of the melt: temperature and pressure. The terms and constants that enter the equations of rheology have themselves been interpreted, to a large extent, by molecular mechanisms triggered by the changes occurring to the statistical description of the individual chains: the dynamic molecular models of Rouse (for un-entangled melts) and of de Gennes (reptation) for entangled melts illustrate the current formulation and understanding of the rheology of polymer melts. On the other hand, we have pointed out in several publications the problems surfacing in the classical molecular interpretation of the rheological data when revisited by our analysis, and the contradictions arising from these models when they are applied to theunderstanding of new experimental work on“the strain-induced time dependence of the melt viscosity” leading to the technologies of “Rheo-Fluidification” of melts and of their “sustained-Orientation”. In short, we have concluded that the current comprehension of the visco-elasticity of polymers, in particular of the entanglement concept,is not compatible with the reality of new experimental facts and, therefore, that the current accepted theories should be debated and revised; more generally, that a different approach to the physics of interactions in polymers should be considered. We have already introduced the principles of such a theory of interactions of Dual-conformers in which the statistical system is no longer a single macromolecule, but a self-generated collective network of Dual-Conformers belongingto the macromolecules. The local deformation of the Dual-conformers and the collective network enthalpy and entropy are interactively emerging from the solution of the Grain-Field Statistics applied to the interactions between the Dual-conformers, demonstrating the dissipative character of the solutions: this is our new foundation to explain the observed experimental facts, old and new, regarding the visco-elastic effects of melts under shear-deformation, linear or non-linear. This paper presents the Dual-Phase Rheology Protocol (DPRP) i.e. how to derive the parameters of the new statistical approach from the visco-elastic moduli G’(w,T) and G”(w,T) in dynamic rheology. In particular, it is shown that a completely different empirical presentation of the rheological results can be expressed in terms revealingthe relevance of the Dual-Phase and Cross-Dual-Phase concepts. We introduce, for the 1st time, an empirical analysis of the data that permits to relate the rheological properties of an entangled melt (M > Mc, the entanglement molecular weight) to the stability of the solution presented by the split of Dual-Phases into Cross-Dual-Phases. In other words, the “entanglement” of the macromolecules can be quantified in terms of the viscosity, h,  and the intrinsic elasticity, c=(G’/G*)2 of the individual interactive Dual-Phases emerging from the split to re-establish a new rheological stability of the melt as M increases. This paper also introduces a roaster of new rheological markers that can be traced to analyze phenomena visible in rheology, widening the panel of analytical tools available to characterize difficult situations (blends, branches etc.).

 

Keywords

 

Dual-Phase Rheology Protocol, DPRP, Dual-Phase model, Cross-Dual-Phase model, Grain-Field-Statistics, Dual Conformer, Cross-Duality, Entanglement, Disentanglement, Rheo-Fluidification, Sustained-Orientation, entanglement instability, polymer melt rheology, molecular dynamics, reptation, Newtonian viscosity, Maxwell’s rheology equations, Thermo-Vogel-Fulcher equation of viscosity, MX-PLOT, interactive coupling, TLL transition.

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENT

ABSRACT  

TABLE OF CONTENT

INTRODUCTION  p.4

GLOSSARY OF THE TERMS AND BACKGROUND DEFINITIONS. p.6

          1. Dual-Splitting. p.6

          2. Scaling of the Dual-Split Terms. Scales Correlation Maps. p.7

            3. The Dynamic Thermo-Vogel-Fulcher Equation (DTVF). p.8

            4.  MX-PLOTS. p.10

           5.  Visco-Elastic Range Dynamic Fragmentation. p.11

          6. Classical Entanglement Rheological Criteria.  Dual-Phase Rheological   Proto  col (DPRP): Single-Dual-Phase vs. Two Dual-Phases Criteria. p.12

          7. Dual-Phase Dynamic Frequencies. p.13

 

ILLUSTRATION OF THE DPRP DEFINITIONS AND PARAMETERS. p.14

 

          8. Data Assessment. p.14

          9. The TVF equation. p.20

          10. The MX-PLOT.p.20

          11. The Structure of c into c1 and c2 . p.30

          12. Discontinuities. Asymmetrical roles of c1 and c2. p.39

 

SCALING OF THE DUAL-PHASE TERMS.  p.48

 

          13. Equations for the structure of c by splitting c vs G* using Eq. 2.  p.48

          14. Analysis of the X-scale and Y-scale. p.50

          15. Traditional Analysis of the X-scale and Y-scale. p.50

          16. Scale Correlations Maps: The “Esoteric” Approach. p.60

          17. Single Dual-Phase (DP) or Cross (Entangled) Dual-Phases (DP1, DP2).            p.70

          18. Construction of the Cross-Dual-Phases: the Linear approach. p.73

          19. Correlations between the Active terms of the Structure of c1(w)  and c2(w):   B1, B2, R1                      and R2.  Expression of the Cross-Duality. p.83

 

          20. Construction of the Cross-Dual-Phases: The Non-Linear Approach. p.92

          21. Conversion of the c structure results to Viscosity. p.100

          22. The Question of the “dc” terms (Fig.11i). p.106

          23. Dynamic Network Frequencies. p.107

          24. Strain Induced Time dependence of viscoelasticity. p.110

         25. Orientation of the Network of Dissipative Interactions. p.115

 

SUMMARY OF THE DUAL-PHASE RHEOLOGICAL PROTOCOL (DPRP). p.117

 

DISCUSSION. p.121

 

CONCLUSIONS p.132

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. p.134

 

REFERENCES. p.135

 

 

EXCERPT from the DPRP paper:

 

“We have accumulated empirical knowledge through experimentation [1, 3-5] that enables the determination of the dynamic parameters (w, strain) that trigger the time dependence of the rheological parameters in polymer melts; in other words, we know empirically how to generate the rheological evidence that is denied by the current paradigm of rheology [6-8], but we had not been able to predict it mathematically until now. Our challenging model of entanglements as Cross-Dual-Phases can now address mathematically the time dependence of the rheological state under specific non-linear rheological conditions [1,38,43]; it can also explain the difference between “Rheo-Fluidification” and “Sustained-Orientation”, in particular why it was more difficult, retrospectively, to obtain the “Sustained-Orientation” benefits than the Rheo-Fluidification ones”.

 

FULL PAPER (downloadable):

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20645765

 

 

 

 

Jean Pierre Ibar

jpibar@alum.mit.edu